SHARE

Hannah Bleau Mark Wahlberg was trending last night

. “Oh crap,” I thought. Another sexual harassment scandal. Nope. Not this time. This “scandal” included a sizable”gender wage gap, “and now everyone is ticked at Mark Wahlberg

. It all started with these tweets.

On the day after screen of female power at the #goldenglobes, I discovered that there was an egregious pay gap between Michelle Williams and Mark Wahlberg for the All the cash in the World reshoot. Did they think this wouldn’t come out? Undesirable #TimesUp– Melissa Silverstein (@melsil) January 9, 2018 I began this last night and now it has actually been validated by others. Michelle Williams paid under 1,000 and Mark Wahlberg paid 1.5 m. Williams was informed they were all donating their time for the reshoots. THIS IS AN OUTRIGHT GENDER PAY GAP. #paymichelle https://t.co/edORyoNkgf!.?.!https://t.co/red4f2LQF4!.?.!— Melissa Silverstein(@melsil) January 10, 2018 It’s gross that technically she wasn’t even earning money; the$1000 was her daily, which I presume he worked out individually above and beyond his fee. And then there’s the beautiful @MrJonCryer who DONATES HIS CHARGE from the @Undisclosedpod to causes recommended by listeners. — Jen Frankel( @jenfrankel ) January 10, 2018 she was told everybody

was working for free. daily is separate. He was a cock and so in order to get it done they offered him the cash and they expected her to just live with it. No More Silence on these issues. #timesup– Melissa Silverstein (@melsil ) January 10, 2018 Michelle Williams said in a red carpet interview that she waived her fee for the reshoots in the scenarios.– Sara Orritt(

@saraorritt ) January 9, 2018 But did Mark Wahlberg? And did

she do it because she presumed they both had done it? This requires method more responses.– Melissa Silverstein( @melsil ) January 9, 2018 Here are the details, via U.S.A. Today. Mark Wahlberg was paid$1.5 million for reshooting his scenes in All the

Loan on the planet, three individuals knowledgeable about the situation however not licensed to speak publicly about it inform U.S.A. TODAY, while Michelle Williams was paid an $80 per diem amounting to less than$1,000. That works out to Williams being paid less than 1%of her male co-star. Ridley Scott’s Getty kidnapping drama was quickly reshot the week of Thanksgiving after a cascade

of sexual misbehavior claims were made public against Kevin Spacey, who formerly starred in the drama as billionaire J. Paul Getty.Scott transfixed the movie world by rapidly assembling his stars over the vacation break in Europe, reshooting Spacey’s scenes with Christopher Plummer– and still making his Christmas release window. This reminds me of the sexual assault scandals in Hollywood.

All those years, Hollywood elites lectured US for being huge sexist a-holes, however THEY were living in that environment and allowing that behavior all along. It’s the exact same thing in this case. Hollywood elites are the FIRST to yell about how services are sexist and not paying men and ladies the same, but THEY ARE LIVING IT. Hollywood is doing that. It’s yet another amazing display screen of hypocrisy. Brand-new information exposes unsightly mathematics behind the Hollywood victory. The reshoot expense $10 million(a charge set up by producing arm Imperative ). In December, Scott told USA TODAY that the undertaking was helped by the fact that” everyone did it for absolutely nothing.”The exchange went as follows: RIDLEY SCOTT:”The entire reshoot was– in normal terms was expensive however not as pricey as you believe. Since all them, everyone did it for nothing. “USA TODAY:” Truly?” SCOTT:” No, I wouldn’t get paid, I declined to earn money.”USA TODAY:”You didn’t pay the actors more to do it?”SCOTT: “No, they all can be found in complimentary. Christopher needed to earn money. However

Michelle, no. Me, no. I wouldn’t

do that to– “U.S.A. TODAY:”The crew, of course, did make money? “SCOTT:”Obviously. “USA TODAY has actually since learned Wahlberg’s team in fact negotiated a substantial fee, with the star paid$

1.5 million for his reshoots. Williams was

n’t told. I mean, it draws for her, but perhaps she should get much better

individuals to work out on her behalf? And possibly liberal directors shouldn’t lie to actors and starlets? Just a concept. This doesn’t show that we live in a giant sexist society that prospers off a gender wage space. This shows that Hollywood is filled with

slimy hypocrites who have no room to preach to us about anything. This is disgraceful. And both Wahlberg and Williams are repped by the same

company: WME … Exclusive: Wahlberg paid$1.5 M for’All the Money’reshoot, Williams got less than $1,000 https://t.co/Ig59pht7M8!.?.!— Yashar Ali (@yashar) January 10, 2018 This is so ruined that it is practically tough to think. Practically. This is how this organisation works. I question if the studio or Wahlberg will do something to make the situation less outrageous. https://t.co/RsunBlOeCk!.?.!— Judd Apatow (@JuddApatow ) January 10, 2018 Agencies have to stop being

complicit in the underpayment of their customers.– Patricia Arquette( @PattyArquette) January 10, 2018 There needs to be brand-new language voiding offers made unless all individuals

participate in the favored countries structure– Patricia Arquette(@PattyArquette)

January 10, 2018 This ought to consist of concealed advantages like points and back end and credits.– Patricia Arquette(@PattyArquette) January 10, 2018 Id’also want to specify the apparent. Mark Wahlberg is a big time star. Like A-list product. I have actually never become aware of Michelle Williams, and neither have a lot of other individuals. Just stating. Actors are not paid the same! Much goes into coming up with pay. Experience, box workplace,

fans, problem of role, nominations, etc — Haley Lynne( @MsHaleyLynne87) January 9, 2018 Believe Mark Wahlberg is more deserving that Michelle Williams? In what universe?– Melissa Silverstein(@melsil) January 9, 2018 Intriguing. I wonder if Michelle’s circumstance was

considered various due to the fact that she was under contract/in middle of shooting Sony

‘s Venom, so she was currently being paid for those days. I dunno. Shitty if real, though Wahlberg’s quote is normally greater anyway …– Jeff Sneider( @TheInSneider) January 9, 2018 Are you guys major? I can’t stand Mark Wahlberg as an actor, however if you are making the argument that Michelle Williams is as big a draw card as him, due to her winning Oscar

‘s, that is simply ridiculous! It isn’t really about gender or talent, like it or not, he is worth more.– Sarah Greenhill (@SaraGreenhill) January 10, 2018 That’s what I’m getting at … Yep, exactly

, which isn’t an abnormality, it isn’t an argument about her talent or gender

, it is simply that Mark earns money more, as his motion pictures make more loan, easy actually!– Sarah Greenhill(@SaraGreenhill) January 10, 2018 However then there’s this: According to Sony itself, Michelle Williams is the movie’s lead starlet; Mark Wahlberg is a supporting star. And the very same agency, William Morris, represents both of them. Not good.– Mark Harris(@MarkHarrisNYC ) January 10, 2018 I do not understand … Her lifetime motion picture gross:$793,353,260 His lifetime movie gross:$

2,896,717,611 Yep, she certainly “should have” to make as much as he does, cuz vaginal area.– Leah the Employer(@LeahRBoss) January 10, 2018 Well that is not exactly what I was informed. His spokesperson would

not respond to my questions.– Melissa Silverstein(@melsil)

January 9, 2018 1. Her”male co-star”was Mark Wahlberg(a Hollywood A-list actor) 2. I have never ever become aware of Michelle Williams in my life 3. Who forced her to accept a$1000? https://t.co/3JyywleWrw!.?.!pic.twitter.com/2MPvGIfY7s!.?.!— Harry Khachatrian(@Harry1T6 ) January 10, 2018 Mark Wahlberg a well-known actor making more loan than someone I didn’t even know existed till now? oh, the scary!– Femme Fatale (@AnastasiaGRose

) January 10, 2018 I would not call it sexism that Michelle Williams just earned money $1000.00 and Mark Wahlberg got paid 1 million for reshoots in All the cash in the World.

I ‘d say that actress is desperate and dumb and requires a brand-new agent!– Mark Dice(@MarkDice) January 10, 2018 That’s exactly what many individuals seem to think. For me, this only proves one thing:

Hollywood’s hypocrisy.What state you?

Source

https://www.chicksonright.com/2018/01/10/hollywood-throws-itself-under-the-bus-in-yet-another-glorious-display-of-hypocrisy/

NO COMMENTS

LEAVE A REPLY